---

The recent 2025 Philippine midterm elections have once again brought to the forefront a familiar but troubling refrain: the idea of choosing the “lesser evil” in politics. This phrase has become a recurring theme in our electoral discourse, especially in contests for the Senate, where the choices often feel like picking between candidates who fall short of the ideals we wish to see in leadership. 

But what does it really mean to vote for the lesser evil, and why does this mindset persist despite its obvious limitations? More importantly, how does this affect the power of our vote and our collective hope for good governance?

At its core, the concept of the “lesser evil” suggests a pragmatic approach: since no candidate is perfect, we settle for the one who is perceived to be less harmful than the others. This logic has been invoked repeatedly in Philippine elections, where political dynasties dominate the scene and fresh alternatives are scarce. 

The 2025 midterms were no exception. Familiar names like the Marcoses, Dutertes and Cayetanos again featured prominently on the senatorial slate, backed by well-oiled political machines. Meanwhile, opposition candidates often come from marginalized sectors or activist groups whose platforms struggle to gain the same visibility and resources. The result is a ballot where the options can feel limiting, and voters are left to choose between less-than-ideal figures.

While this might seem like a practical compromise, it carries a troubling consequence: it normalizes a cycle of mediocrity and cynicism. When we repeatedly accept candidates who are “less bad” rather than genuinely good, it signals to the political establishment that the electorate is willing to tolerate subpar leadership. This, in turn, stifles efforts to cultivate new leaders who could bring fresh ideas and reforms. 

Instead, political families and established power brokers maintain their grip on office, knowing that voters feel compelled to choose them to avoid perceived worse alternatives. Over time, this dynamic erodes trust in the democratic process and fosters voter apathy, as people become disillusioned and resigned to “lesser evil” choices rather than inspired by leaders who genuinely embody integrity and competence.

Yet, amid this reality, the power of the vote should not be underestimated. The fact that voter turnout remained high, at over 82 percent in 2025, shows that Filipinos remain committed to participating in democracy despite frustrations. Our votes are not mere expressions of resignation but potential tools for change. The challenge lies in how we exercise this power. Simply settling for the lesser evil without critical engagement allows the status quo to persist. 

However, when voters demand transparency, accountability and concrete plans from candidates, the political environment can gradually shift to favor those who truly serve the public interest. Civil society groups, media and educational institutions play a vital role in this by fostering political literacy and encouraging meaningful discussions about the values and platforms of candidates rather than name recognition alone.

Breaking free from the cycle of the lesser evil also requires systemic reforms. The persistence of political dynasties, unchecked campaign financing and lack of transparent governance create structural barriers for new leaders and grassroots candidates. Laws that limit dynastic power, regulate political spending and improve electoral transparency are essential to widen the pool of viable candidates. 

Supporting independent candidates and movements that prioritize good governance and public welfare is equally crucial in giving voters real alternatives to the usual political heavyweights.

Ultimately, the goal should be a political culture where elections are not about picking the least harmful option but about choosing leaders who represent the aspirations, values, and needs of the Filipino people. This shift demands sustained effort from all sectors of society: voters who educate themselves and vote consciously; media and civil society that hold power accountable; and political institutions that promote fairness and integrity. 

Our vote matters not because it is a mere formality, but because it is a powerful instrument capable of shaping the future of our nation. The “lesser evil” narrative reflects a deep frustration with the current state of Philippine politics, but it should not become a justification for complacency—it should fuel action. 

Good governance is not some abstract ideal, it’s a necessity that demands proactive engagement and action.

When we refuse to settle for less, demand better candidates, and advocate for meaningful reforms, elections shift from a choice between evils into what they are really meant to be: a celebration of democracy and genuine leadership. 

After all, in a true democracy, the power of the vote is only as strong as the will of the people to use it wisely.